Adding upstream version 6.1.76.upstream/6.1.76

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>

1 files changed, 308 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/include/uapi/scsi/scsi_bsg_fc.h b/include/uapi/scsi/scsi_bsg_fc.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..7f5930801
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/uapi/scsi/scsi_bsg_fc.h
@@ -0,0 +1,308 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note */
+/*
+ *  FC Transport BSG Interface
+ *
+ *  Copyright (C) 2008   James Smart, Emulex Corporation
+ */
+
+#ifndef SCSI_BSG_FC_H
+#define SCSI_BSG_FC_H
+
+#include <linux/types.h>
+
+/*
+ * This file intended to be included by both kernel and user space
+ */
+
+/*
+ * FC Transport SGIO v4 BSG Message Support
+ */
+
+/* Default BSG request timeout (in seconds) */
+#define FC_DEFAULT_BSG_TIMEOUT		(10 * HZ)
+
+
+/*
+ * Request Message Codes supported by the FC Transport
+ */
+
+/* define the class masks for the message codes */
+#define FC_BSG_CLS_MASK		0xF0000000	/* find object class */
+#define FC_BSG_HST_MASK		0x80000000	/* fc host class */
+#define FC_BSG_RPT_MASK		0x40000000	/* fc rport class */
+
+	/* fc_host Message Codes */
+#define FC_BSG_HST_ADD_RPORT		(FC_BSG_HST_MASK | 0x00000001)
+#define FC_BSG_HST_DEL_RPORT		(FC_BSG_HST_MASK | 0x00000002)
+#define FC_BSG_HST_ELS_NOLOGIN		(FC_BSG_HST_MASK | 0x00000003)
+#define FC_BSG_HST_CT			(FC_BSG_HST_MASK | 0x00000004)
+#define FC_BSG_HST_VENDOR		(FC_BSG_HST_MASK | 0x000000FF)
+
+	/* fc_rport Message Codes */
+#define FC_BSG_RPT_ELS			(FC_BSG_RPT_MASK | 0x00000001)
+#define FC_BSG_RPT_CT			(FC_BSG_RPT_MASK | 0x00000002)
+
+
+
+/*
+ * FC Address Identifiers in Message Structures :
+ *
+ *   Whenever a command payload contains a FC Address Identifier
+ *   (aka port_id), the value is effectively in big-endian
+ *   order, thus the array elements are decoded as follows:
+ *     element [0] is bits 23:16 of the FC Address Identifier
+ *     element [1] is bits 15:8 of the FC Address Identifier
+ *     element [2] is bits 7:0 of the FC Address Identifier
+ */
+
+
+/*
+ * FC Host Messages
+ */
+
+/* FC_BSG_HST_ADDR_PORT : */
+
+/* Request:
+ * This message requests the FC host to login to the remote port
+ * at the specified N_Port_Id.  The remote port is to be enumerated
+ * with the transport upon completion of the login.
+ */
+struct fc_bsg_host_add_rport {
+	__u8	reserved;
+
+	/* FC Address Identier of the remote port to login to */
+	__u8	port_id[3];
+};
+
+/* Response:
+ * There is no additional response data - fc_bsg_reply->result is sufficient
+ */
+
+
+/* FC_BSG_HST_DEL_RPORT : */
+
+/* Request:
+ * This message requests the FC host to remove an enumerated
+ * remote port and to terminate the login to it.
+ *
+ * Note: The driver is free to reject this request if it desires to
+ * remain logged in with the remote port.
+ */
+struct fc_bsg_host_del_rport {
+	__u8	reserved;
+
+	/* FC Address Identier of the remote port to logout of */
+	__u8	port_id[3];
+};
+
+/* Response:
+ * There is no additional response data - fc_bsg_reply->result is sufficient
+ */
+
+
+/* FC_BSG_HST_ELS_NOLOGIN : */
+
+/* Request:
+ * This message requests the FC_Host to send an ELS to a specific
+ * N_Port_ID. The host does not need to log into the remote port,
+ * nor does it need to enumerate the rport for further traffic
+ * (although, the FC host is free to do so if it desires).
+ */
+struct fc_bsg_host_els {
+	/*
+	 * ELS Command Code being sent (must be the same as byte 0
+	 * of the payload)
+	 */
+	__u8	command_code;
+
+	/* FC Address Identier of the remote port to send the ELS to */
+	__u8	port_id[3];
+};
+
+/* Response:
+ */
+/* fc_bsg_ctels_reply->status values */
+#define FC_CTELS_STATUS_OK	0x00000000
+#define FC_CTELS_STATUS_REJECT	0x00000001
+#define FC_CTELS_STATUS_P_RJT	0x00000002
+#define FC_CTELS_STATUS_F_RJT	0x00000003
+#define FC_CTELS_STATUS_P_BSY	0x00000004
+#define FC_CTELS_STATUS_F_BSY	0x00000006
+struct fc_bsg_ctels_reply {
+	/*
+	 * Note: An ELS LS_RJT may be reported in 2 ways:
+	 *  a) A status of FC_CTELS_STATUS_OK is returned. The caller
+	 *     is to look into the ELS receive payload to determine
+	 *     LS_ACC or LS_RJT (by contents of word 0). The reject
+	 *     data will be in word 1.
+	 *  b) A status of FC_CTELS_STATUS_REJECT is returned, The
+	 *     rjt_data field will contain valid data.
+	 *
+	 * Note: ELS LS_ACC is determined by an FC_CTELS_STATUS_OK, and
+	 *   the receive payload word 0 indicates LS_ACC
+	 *   (e.g. value is 0x02xxxxxx).
+	 *
+	 * Note: Similarly, a CT Reject may be reported in 2 ways:
+	 *  a) A status of FC_CTELS_STATUS_OK is returned. The caller
+	 *     is to look into the CT receive payload to determine
+	 *     Accept or Reject (by contents of word 2). The reject
+	 *     data will be in word 3.
+	 *  b) A status of FC_CTELS_STATUS_REJECT is returned, The
+	 *     rjt_data field will contain valid data.
+	 *
+	 * Note: x_RJT/BSY status will indicae that the rjt_data field
+	 *   is valid and contains the reason/explanation values.
+	 */
+	__u32	status;		/* See FC_CTELS_STATUS_xxx */
+
+	/* valid if status is not FC_CTELS_STATUS_OK */
+	struct	{
+		__u8	action;		/* fragment_id for CT REJECT */
+		__u8	reason_code;
+		__u8	reason_explanation;
+		__u8	vendor_unique;
+	} rjt_data;
+};
+
+
+/* FC_BSG_HST_CT : */
+
+/* Request:
+ * This message requests that a CT Request be performed with the
+ * indicated N_Port_ID. The driver is responsible for logging in with
+ * the fabric and/or N_Port_ID, etc as per FC rules. This request does
+ * not mandate that the driver must enumerate the destination in the
+ * transport. The driver is allowed to decide whether to enumerate it,
+ * and whether to tear it down after the request.
+ */
+struct fc_bsg_host_ct {
+	__u8	reserved;
+
+	/* FC Address Identier of the remote port to send the ELS to */
+	__u8	port_id[3];
+
+	/*
+	 * We need words 0-2 of the generic preamble for the LLD's
+	 */
+	__u32	preamble_word0;	/* revision & IN_ID */
+	__u32	preamble_word1;	/* GS_Type, GS_SubType, Options, Rsvd */
+	__u32	preamble_word2;	/* Cmd Code, Max Size */
+
+};
+/* Response:
+ *
+ * The reply structure is an fc_bsg_ctels_reply structure
+ */
+
+
+/* FC_BSG_HST_VENDOR : */
+
+/* Request:
+ * Note: When specifying vendor_id, be sure to read the Vendor Type and ID
+ *   formatting requirements specified in scsi_netlink.h
+ */
+struct fc_bsg_host_vendor {
+	/*
+	 * Identifies the vendor that the message is formatted for. This
+	 * should be the recipient of the message.
+	 */
+	__u64 vendor_id;
+
+	/* start of vendor command area */
+	__u32 vendor_cmd[];
+};
+
+/* Response:
+ */
+struct fc_bsg_host_vendor_reply {
+	/* start of vendor response area */
+	__u32 vendor_rsp[0];
+};
+
+
+
+/*
+ * FC Remote Port Messages
+ */
+
+/* FC_BSG_RPT_ELS : */
+
+/* Request:
+ * This message requests that an ELS be performed with the rport.
+ */
+struct fc_bsg_rport_els {
+	/*
+	 * ELS Command Code being sent (must be the same as
+	 * byte 0 of the payload)
+	 */
+	__u8 els_code;
+};
+
+/* Response:
+ *
+ * The reply structure is an fc_bsg_ctels_reply structure
+ */
+
+
+/* FC_BSG_RPT_CT : */
+
+/* Request:
+ * This message requests that a CT Request be performed with the rport.
+ */
+struct fc_bsg_rport_ct {
+	/*
+	 * We need words 0-2 of the generic preamble for the LLD's
+	 */
+	__u32	preamble_word0;	/* revision & IN_ID */
+	__u32	preamble_word1;	/* GS_Type, GS_SubType, Options, Rsvd */
+	__u32	preamble_word2;	/* Cmd Code, Max Size */
+};
+/* Response:
+ *
+ * The reply structure is an fc_bsg_ctels_reply structure
+ */
+
+
+
+
+/* request (CDB) structure of the sg_io_v4 */
+struct fc_bsg_request {
+	__u32 msgcode;
+	union {
+		struct fc_bsg_host_add_rport	h_addrport;
+		struct fc_bsg_host_del_rport	h_delrport;
+		struct fc_bsg_host_els		h_els;
+		struct fc_bsg_host_ct		h_ct;
+		struct fc_bsg_host_vendor	h_vendor;
+
+		struct fc_bsg_rport_els		r_els;
+		struct fc_bsg_rport_ct		r_ct;
+	} rqst_data;
+} __attribute__((packed));
+
+
+/* response (request sense data) structure of the sg_io_v4 */
+struct fc_bsg_reply {
+	/*
+	 * The completion result. Result exists in two forms:
+	 *  if negative, it is an -Exxx system errno value. There will
+	 *    be no further reply information supplied.
+	 *  else, it's the 4-byte scsi error result, with driver, host,
+	 *    msg and status fields. The per-msgcode reply structure
+	 *    will contain valid data.
+	 */
+	__u32 result;
+
+	/* If there was reply_payload, how much was recevied ? */
+	__u32 reply_payload_rcv_len;
+
+	union {
+		struct fc_bsg_host_vendor_reply		vendor_reply;
+
+		struct fc_bsg_ctels_reply		ctels_reply;
+	} reply_data;
+};
+
+
+#endif /* SCSI_BSG_FC_H */
+