summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/mm/damon/vaddr-test.h
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDaniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>2024-04-07 18:49:45 +0000
committerDaniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>2024-04-07 18:49:45 +0000
commit2c3c1048746a4622d8c89a29670120dc8fab93c4 (patch)
tree848558de17fb3008cdf4d861b01ac7781903ce39 /mm/damon/vaddr-test.h
parentInitial commit. (diff)
downloadlinux-2c3c1048746a4622d8c89a29670120dc8fab93c4.tar.xz
linux-2c3c1048746a4622d8c89a29670120dc8fab93c4.zip
Adding upstream version 6.1.76.upstream/6.1.76
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/damon/vaddr-test.h')
-rw-r--r--mm/damon/vaddr-test.h316
1 files changed, 316 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/mm/damon/vaddr-test.h b/mm/damon/vaddr-test.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..e939598af
--- /dev/null
+++ b/mm/damon/vaddr-test.h
@@ -0,0 +1,316 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/*
+ * Data Access Monitor Unit Tests
+ *
+ * Copyright 2019 Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
+ *
+ * Author: SeongJae Park <sjpark@amazon.de>
+ */
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_DAMON_VADDR_KUNIT_TEST
+
+#ifndef _DAMON_VADDR_TEST_H
+#define _DAMON_VADDR_TEST_H
+
+#include <kunit/test.h>
+
+static void __link_vmas(struct maple_tree *mt, struct vm_area_struct *vmas,
+ ssize_t nr_vmas)
+{
+ int i;
+ MA_STATE(mas, mt, 0, 0);
+
+ if (!nr_vmas)
+ return;
+
+ mas_lock(&mas);
+ for (i = 0; i < nr_vmas; i++)
+ vma_mas_store(&vmas[i], &mas);
+ mas_unlock(&mas);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Test __damon_va_three_regions() function
+ *
+ * In case of virtual memory address spaces monitoring, DAMON converts the
+ * complex and dynamic memory mappings of each target task to three
+ * discontiguous regions which cover every mapped areas. However, the three
+ * regions should not include the two biggest unmapped areas in the original
+ * mapping, because the two biggest areas are normally the areas between 1)
+ * heap and the mmap()-ed regions, and 2) the mmap()-ed regions and stack.
+ * Because these two unmapped areas are very huge but obviously never accessed,
+ * covering the region is just a waste.
+ *
+ * '__damon_va_three_regions() receives an address space of a process. It
+ * first identifies the start of mappings, end of mappings, and the two biggest
+ * unmapped areas. After that, based on the information, it constructs the
+ * three regions and returns. For more detail, refer to the comment of
+ * 'damon_init_regions_of()' function definition in 'mm/damon.c' file.
+ *
+ * For example, suppose virtual address ranges of 10-20, 20-25, 200-210,
+ * 210-220, 300-305, and 307-330 (Other comments represent this mappings in
+ * more short form: 10-20-25, 200-210-220, 300-305, 307-330) of a process are
+ * mapped. To cover every mappings, the three regions should start with 10,
+ * and end with 305. The process also has three unmapped areas, 25-200,
+ * 220-300, and 305-307. Among those, 25-200 and 220-300 are the biggest two
+ * unmapped areas, and thus it should be converted to three regions of 10-25,
+ * 200-220, and 300-330.
+ */
+static void damon_test_three_regions_in_vmas(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ static struct mm_struct mm;
+ struct damon_addr_range regions[3] = {0,};
+ /* 10-20-25, 200-210-220, 300-305, 307-330 */
+ struct vm_area_struct vmas[] = {
+ (struct vm_area_struct) {.vm_start = 10, .vm_end = 20},
+ (struct vm_area_struct) {.vm_start = 20, .vm_end = 25},
+ (struct vm_area_struct) {.vm_start = 200, .vm_end = 210},
+ (struct vm_area_struct) {.vm_start = 210, .vm_end = 220},
+ (struct vm_area_struct) {.vm_start = 300, .vm_end = 305},
+ (struct vm_area_struct) {.vm_start = 307, .vm_end = 330},
+ };
+
+ mt_init_flags(&mm.mm_mt, MM_MT_FLAGS);
+ __link_vmas(&mm.mm_mt, vmas, ARRAY_SIZE(vmas));
+
+ __damon_va_three_regions(&mm, regions);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 10ul, regions[0].start);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 25ul, regions[0].end);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 200ul, regions[1].start);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 220ul, regions[1].end);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 300ul, regions[2].start);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 330ul, regions[2].end);
+}
+
+static struct damon_region *__nth_region_of(struct damon_target *t, int idx)
+{
+ struct damon_region *r;
+ unsigned int i = 0;
+
+ damon_for_each_region(r, t) {
+ if (i++ == idx)
+ return r;
+ }
+
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Test 'damon_set_regions()'
+ *
+ * test kunit object
+ * regions an array containing start/end addresses of current
+ * monitoring target regions
+ * nr_regions the number of the addresses in 'regions'
+ * three_regions The three regions that need to be applied now
+ * expected start/end addresses of monitoring target regions that
+ * 'three_regions' are applied
+ * nr_expected the number of addresses in 'expected'
+ *
+ * The memory mapping of the target processes changes dynamically. To follow
+ * the change, DAMON periodically reads the mappings, simplifies it to the
+ * three regions, and updates the monitoring target regions to fit in the three
+ * regions. The update of current target regions is the role of
+ * 'damon_set_regions()'.
+ *
+ * This test passes the given target regions and the new three regions that
+ * need to be applied to the function and check whether it updates the regions
+ * as expected.
+ */
+static void damon_do_test_apply_three_regions(struct kunit *test,
+ unsigned long *regions, int nr_regions,
+ struct damon_addr_range *three_regions,
+ unsigned long *expected, int nr_expected)
+{
+ struct damon_target *t;
+ struct damon_region *r;
+ int i;
+
+ t = damon_new_target();
+ for (i = 0; i < nr_regions / 2; i++) {
+ r = damon_new_region(regions[i * 2], regions[i * 2 + 1]);
+ damon_add_region(r, t);
+ }
+
+ damon_set_regions(t, three_regions, 3);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < nr_expected / 2; i++) {
+ r = __nth_region_of(t, i);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, expected[i * 2]);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, expected[i * 2 + 1]);
+ }
+
+ damon_destroy_target(t);
+}
+
+/*
+ * This function test most common case where the three big regions are only
+ * slightly changed. Target regions should adjust their boundary (10-20-30,
+ * 50-55, 70-80, 90-100) to fit with the new big regions or remove target
+ * regions (57-79) that now out of the three regions.
+ */
+static void damon_test_apply_three_regions1(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ /* 10-20-30, 50-55-57-59, 70-80-90-100 */
+ unsigned long regions[] = {10, 20, 20, 30, 50, 55, 55, 57, 57, 59,
+ 70, 80, 80, 90, 90, 100};
+ /* 5-27, 45-55, 73-104 */
+ struct damon_addr_range new_three_regions[3] = {
+ (struct damon_addr_range){.start = 5, .end = 27},
+ (struct damon_addr_range){.start = 45, .end = 55},
+ (struct damon_addr_range){.start = 73, .end = 104} };
+ /* 5-20-27, 45-55, 73-80-90-104 */
+ unsigned long expected[] = {5, 20, 20, 27, 45, 55,
+ 73, 80, 80, 90, 90, 104};
+
+ damon_do_test_apply_three_regions(test, regions, ARRAY_SIZE(regions),
+ new_three_regions, expected, ARRAY_SIZE(expected));
+}
+
+/*
+ * Test slightly bigger change. Similar to above, but the second big region
+ * now require two target regions (50-55, 57-59) to be removed.
+ */
+static void damon_test_apply_three_regions2(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ /* 10-20-30, 50-55-57-59, 70-80-90-100 */
+ unsigned long regions[] = {10, 20, 20, 30, 50, 55, 55, 57, 57, 59,
+ 70, 80, 80, 90, 90, 100};
+ /* 5-27, 56-57, 65-104 */
+ struct damon_addr_range new_three_regions[3] = {
+ (struct damon_addr_range){.start = 5, .end = 27},
+ (struct damon_addr_range){.start = 56, .end = 57},
+ (struct damon_addr_range){.start = 65, .end = 104} };
+ /* 5-20-27, 56-57, 65-80-90-104 */
+ unsigned long expected[] = {5, 20, 20, 27, 56, 57,
+ 65, 80, 80, 90, 90, 104};
+
+ damon_do_test_apply_three_regions(test, regions, ARRAY_SIZE(regions),
+ new_three_regions, expected, ARRAY_SIZE(expected));
+}
+
+/*
+ * Test a big change. The second big region has totally freed and mapped to
+ * different area (50-59 -> 61-63). The target regions which were in the old
+ * second big region (50-55-57-59) should be removed and new target region
+ * covering the second big region (61-63) should be created.
+ */
+static void damon_test_apply_three_regions3(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ /* 10-20-30, 50-55-57-59, 70-80-90-100 */
+ unsigned long regions[] = {10, 20, 20, 30, 50, 55, 55, 57, 57, 59,
+ 70, 80, 80, 90, 90, 100};
+ /* 5-27, 61-63, 65-104 */
+ struct damon_addr_range new_three_regions[3] = {
+ (struct damon_addr_range){.start = 5, .end = 27},
+ (struct damon_addr_range){.start = 61, .end = 63},
+ (struct damon_addr_range){.start = 65, .end = 104} };
+ /* 5-20-27, 61-63, 65-80-90-104 */
+ unsigned long expected[] = {5, 20, 20, 27, 61, 63,
+ 65, 80, 80, 90, 90, 104};
+
+ damon_do_test_apply_three_regions(test, regions, ARRAY_SIZE(regions),
+ new_three_regions, expected, ARRAY_SIZE(expected));
+}
+
+/*
+ * Test another big change. Both of the second and third big regions (50-59
+ * and 70-100) has totally freed and mapped to different area (30-32 and
+ * 65-68). The target regions which were in the old second and third big
+ * regions should now be removed and new target regions covering the new second
+ * and third big regions should be created.
+ */
+static void damon_test_apply_three_regions4(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ /* 10-20-30, 50-55-57-59, 70-80-90-100 */
+ unsigned long regions[] = {10, 20, 20, 30, 50, 55, 55, 57, 57, 59,
+ 70, 80, 80, 90, 90, 100};
+ /* 5-7, 30-32, 65-68 */
+ struct damon_addr_range new_three_regions[3] = {
+ (struct damon_addr_range){.start = 5, .end = 7},
+ (struct damon_addr_range){.start = 30, .end = 32},
+ (struct damon_addr_range){.start = 65, .end = 68} };
+ /* expect 5-7, 30-32, 65-68 */
+ unsigned long expected[] = {5, 7, 30, 32, 65, 68};
+
+ damon_do_test_apply_three_regions(test, regions, ARRAY_SIZE(regions),
+ new_three_regions, expected, ARRAY_SIZE(expected));
+}
+
+static void damon_test_split_evenly_fail(struct kunit *test,
+ unsigned long start, unsigned long end, unsigned int nr_pieces)
+{
+ struct damon_target *t = damon_new_target();
+ struct damon_region *r = damon_new_region(start, end);
+
+ damon_add_region(r, t);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test,
+ damon_va_evenly_split_region(t, r, nr_pieces), -EINVAL);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_nr_regions(t), 1u);
+
+ damon_for_each_region(r, t) {
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, start);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, end);
+ }
+
+ damon_free_target(t);
+}
+
+static void damon_test_split_evenly_succ(struct kunit *test,
+ unsigned long start, unsigned long end, unsigned int nr_pieces)
+{
+ struct damon_target *t = damon_new_target();
+ struct damon_region *r = damon_new_region(start, end);
+ unsigned long expected_width = (end - start) / nr_pieces;
+ unsigned long i = 0;
+
+ damon_add_region(r, t);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test,
+ damon_va_evenly_split_region(t, r, nr_pieces), 0);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_nr_regions(t), nr_pieces);
+
+ damon_for_each_region(r, t) {
+ if (i == nr_pieces - 1) {
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test,
+ r->ar.start, start + i * expected_width);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, end);
+ break;
+ }
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test,
+ r->ar.start, start + i++ * expected_width);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, start + i * expected_width);
+ }
+ damon_free_target(t);
+}
+
+static void damon_test_split_evenly(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_va_evenly_split_region(NULL, NULL, 5),
+ -EINVAL);
+
+ damon_test_split_evenly_fail(test, 0, 100, 0);
+ damon_test_split_evenly_succ(test, 0, 100, 10);
+ damon_test_split_evenly_succ(test, 5, 59, 5);
+ damon_test_split_evenly_fail(test, 5, 6, 2);
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case damon_test_cases[] = {
+ KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_three_regions_in_vmas),
+ KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_apply_three_regions1),
+ KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_apply_three_regions2),
+ KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_apply_three_regions3),
+ KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_apply_three_regions4),
+ KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_split_evenly),
+ {},
+};
+
+static struct kunit_suite damon_test_suite = {
+ .name = "damon-operations",
+ .test_cases = damon_test_cases,
+};
+kunit_test_suite(damon_test_suite);
+
+#endif /* _DAMON_VADDR_TEST_H */
+
+#endif /* CONFIG_DAMON_VADDR_KUNIT_TEST */