summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/doc/dev/dashboard
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDaniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>2024-04-07 18:45:59 +0000
committerDaniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>2024-04-07 18:45:59 +0000
commit19fcec84d8d7d21e796c7624e521b60d28ee21ed (patch)
tree42d26aa27d1e3f7c0b8bd3fd14e7d7082f5008dc /doc/dev/dashboard
parentInitial commit. (diff)
downloadceph-19fcec84d8d7d21e796c7624e521b60d28ee21ed.tar.xz
ceph-19fcec84d8d7d21e796c7624e521b60d28ee21ed.zip
Adding upstream version 16.2.11+ds.upstream/16.2.11+dsupstream
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/dev/dashboard')
-rw-r--r--doc/dev/dashboard/ui_goals.rst78
1 files changed, 78 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/dev/dashboard/ui_goals.rst b/doc/dev/dashboard/ui_goals.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..4e68ec1f5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/dev/dashboard/ui_goals.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+===========================
+Ceph Dashboard Design Goals
+===========================
+
+.. note:: This document is intended to provide a focal point for discussing the overall design
+ principles for mgr/dashboard
+
+Introduction
+============
+
+Most distributed storage architectures are inherently complex and can present a management challenge
+to Operations teams who are typically stretched across multiple product and platform disciplines. In
+general terms, the complexity of any solution can have a direct bearing on the operational costs
+incurred to manage it. The answer is simple...make it simple :)
+
+This document is intended to highlight Ceph Dashboard design goals which may help to
+
+* reduce complexity
+* increase productivity
+* improve time-to-value
+* increase observability
+
+
+Understanding the Persona of the Target User
+============================================
+
+Ceph has historically been administered from the CLI. The CLI has always and will always offer the
+richest, most flexible way to install and manage a Ceph cluster. Administrators who require and
+demand this level of control are unlikely to adopt a UI for anything more than a technical curiosity.
+
+The relevance of the UI is therefore more critical for a new SysAdmin, where it can help technology
+adoption and reduce the operational friction that is normally experienced when implementing a new
+solution.
+
+Understanding the target user persona is therefore a fundamental first step in design. Attempting to
+design a UI that meets the requirements of a 'seasoned' Ceph Administrator or Developer, and a
+relatively new SysAdmin is unlikely to satisfy either user group.
+
+Design Principles
+=================
+
+Key Principles
+______________
+
+
+#. **Clarity and consistency**. The UI should ensure the data shown is unambiguous and consistent across
+ different views
+#. **Data timeliness**. Data displayed in the UI must be timely. State information **must** be reasonably
+ recent for it to be relevant and acted upon with confidence. In addition, the age of the data should
+ be shown as age (e.g. 20s ago) rather than UTC timestamps to make it more immediately consumable by
+ the Administrator.
+#. **Automate through workflows**. If the admin has to follow a 'recipe' to perform a task, the goal of
+ the dashboard UI should be to implement the flow.
+#. **Provide a natural next step**. The UI **is** the *expert system*, so instead of expecting the user
+ to know where they go next, the UI should lead them. This means linking components together to
+ establish a flow and deeper integration between the alertmanager implementation and the dashboard
+ elements enabling an Admin to efficiently step from alert to affected component.
+#. **Platform visibility**. The platform (OS and hardware configuration) is a fundamental component of the
+ solution, so providing platform level insights can help deliver a more holistic view of the Ceph cluster.
+#. **Jargon Busting**. Jargon is an unavoidable component of most systems. However, a good system will
+ include inline help to support new and infrequent users of the UI.
+
+
+Common Pitfalls
+_______________
+
+* Don't re-implement CLI commands in the UI. The sysadmin will likely use the CLI primitives in scripts
+ to automate tasks, so by simply adding a CLI feature we miss the workflow and add complexity, which
+ potentially 'bloats' the UI.
+* Don't think like a developer...try and adopt the mindset of an Administrator, who only works with the
+ Ceph cluster part-time - this is the reality for today's Operations teams.
+
+
+Focus On User Experience
+========================
+Ultimately, the goal must be to move away from pushing complexity onto the GUI user through multi-step
+workflows like iSCSI configuration or setting specific cluster flags in defined sequences. Simplicity
+should be the goal for the UI...let's leave the complexity to the CLI.