Adding upstream version 9.1.upstream/9.1upstream

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>

1 files changed, 113 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/m4/longlong.m4 b/m4/longlong.m4
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..eefb37c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/m4/longlong.m4
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+# longlong.m4 serial 17
+dnl Copyright (C) 1999-2007, 2009-2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+dnl This file is free software; the Free Software Foundation
+dnl gives unlimited permission to copy and/or distribute it,
+dnl with or without modifications, as long as this notice is preserved.
+
+dnl From Paul Eggert.
+
+# Define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT if 'long long int' works.
+# This fixes a bug in Autoconf 2.61, and can be faster
+# than what's in Autoconf 2.62 through 2.68.
+
+# Note: If the type 'long long int' exists but is only 32 bits large
+# (as on some very old compilers), HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT will not be
+# defined. In this case you can treat 'long long int' like 'long int'.
+
+AC_DEFUN([AC_TYPE_LONG_LONG_INT],
+[
+  AC_REQUIRE([AC_TYPE_UNSIGNED_LONG_LONG_INT])
+  AC_CACHE_CHECK([for long long int], [ac_cv_type_long_long_int],
+     [ac_cv_type_long_long_int=yes
+      if test "x${ac_cv_prog_cc_c99-no}" = xno; then
+        ac_cv_type_long_long_int=$ac_cv_type_unsigned_long_long_int
+        if test $ac_cv_type_long_long_int = yes; then
+          dnl Catch a bug in Tandem NonStop Kernel (OSS) cc -O circa 2004.
+          dnl If cross compiling, assume the bug is not important, since
+          dnl nobody cross compiles for this platform as far as we know.
+          AC_RUN_IFELSE(
+            [AC_LANG_PROGRAM(
+               [[@%:@include <limits.h>
+                 @%:@ifndef LLONG_MAX
+                 @%:@ define HALF \
+                          (1LL << (sizeof (long long int) * CHAR_BIT - 2))
+                 @%:@ define LLONG_MAX (HALF - 1 + HALF)
+                 @%:@endif]],
+               [[long long int n = 1;
+                 int i;
+                 for (i = 0; ; i++)
+                   {
+                     long long int m = n << i;
+                     if (m >> i != n)
+                       return 1;
+                     if (LLONG_MAX / 2 < m)
+                       break;
+                   }
+                 return 0;]])],
+            [],
+            [ac_cv_type_long_long_int=no],
+            [:])
+        fi
+      fi])
+  if test $ac_cv_type_long_long_int = yes; then
+    AC_DEFINE([HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT], [1],
+      [Define to 1 if the system has the type 'long long int'.])
+  fi
+])
+
+# Define HAVE_UNSIGNED_LONG_LONG_INT if 'unsigned long long int' works.
+# This fixes a bug in Autoconf 2.61, and can be faster
+# than what's in Autoconf 2.62 through 2.68.
+
+# Note: If the type 'unsigned long long int' exists but is only 32 bits
+# large (as on some very old compilers), AC_TYPE_UNSIGNED_LONG_LONG_INT
+# will not be defined. In this case you can treat 'unsigned long long int'
+# like 'unsigned long int'.
+
+AC_DEFUN([AC_TYPE_UNSIGNED_LONG_LONG_INT],
+[
+  AC_CACHE_CHECK([for unsigned long long int],
+    [ac_cv_type_unsigned_long_long_int],
+    [ac_cv_type_unsigned_long_long_int=yes
+     if test "x${ac_cv_prog_cc_c99-no}" = xno; then
+       AC_LINK_IFELSE(
+         [_AC_TYPE_LONG_LONG_SNIPPET],
+         [],
+         [ac_cv_type_unsigned_long_long_int=no])
+     fi])
+  if test $ac_cv_type_unsigned_long_long_int = yes; then
+    AC_DEFINE([HAVE_UNSIGNED_LONG_LONG_INT], [1],
+      [Define to 1 if the system has the type 'unsigned long long int'.])
+  fi
+])
+
+# Expands to a C program that can be used to test for simultaneous support
+# of 'long long' and 'unsigned long long'. We don't want to say that
+# 'long long' is available if 'unsigned long long' is not, or vice versa,
+# because too many programs rely on the symmetry between signed and unsigned
+# integer types (excluding 'bool').
+AC_DEFUN([_AC_TYPE_LONG_LONG_SNIPPET],
+[
+  AC_LANG_PROGRAM(
+    [[/* For now, do not test the preprocessor; as of 2007 there are too many
+         implementations with broken preprocessors.  Perhaps this can
+         be revisited in 2012.  In the meantime, code should not expect
+         #if to work with literals wider than 32 bits.  */
+      /* Test literals.  */
+      long long int ll = 9223372036854775807ll;
+      long long int nll = -9223372036854775807LL;
+      unsigned long long int ull = 18446744073709551615ULL;
+      /* Test constant expressions.   */
+      typedef int a[((-9223372036854775807LL < 0 && 0 < 9223372036854775807ll)
+                     ? 1 : -1)];
+      typedef int b[(18446744073709551615ULL <= (unsigned long long int) -1
+                     ? 1 : -1)];
+      int i = 63;]],
+    [[/* Test availability of runtime routines for shift and division.  */
+      long long int llmax = 9223372036854775807ll;
+      unsigned long long int ullmax = 18446744073709551615ull;
+      return ((ll << 63) | (ll >> 63) | (ll < i) | (ll > i)
+              | (llmax / ll) | (llmax % ll)
+              | (ull << 63) | (ull >> 63) | (ull << i) | (ull >> i)
+              | (ullmax / ull) | (ullmax % ull));]])
+])