Adding upstream version 115.7.0esr.upstream/115.7.0esrupstream

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>

1 files changed, 182 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/js/src/tests/non262/RegExp/regress-188206.js b/js/src/tests/non262/RegExp/regress-188206.js
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..0ca4d46610
--- /dev/null
+++ b/js/src/tests/non262/RegExp/regress-188206.js
@@ -0,0 +1,182 @@
+/* -*- indent-tabs-mode: nil; js-indent-level: 2 -*- */
+/* This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public
+ * License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this
+ * file, You can obtain one at http://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/. */
+
+/*
+ *
+ * Date:    21 January 2003
+ * SUMMARY: Invalid use of regexp quantifiers should generate SyntaxErrors
+ *
+ * See http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=188206
+ * and http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85721#c48 etc.
+ * and http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=190685
+ * and http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=197451
+ */
+//-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
+var UBound = 0;
+var BUGNUMBER = 188206;
+var summary = 'Invalid use of regexp quantifiers should generate SyntaxErrors';
+var TEST_PASSED = 'SyntaxError';
+var TEST_FAILED = 'Generated an error, but NOT a SyntaxError!';
+var TEST_FAILED_BADLY = 'Did not generate ANY error!!!';
+var CHECK_PASSED = 'Should not generate an error';
+var CHECK_FAILED = 'Generated an error!';
+var status = '';
+var statusitems = [];
+var actual = '';
+var actualvalues = [];
+var expect= '';
+var expectedvalues = [];
+
+
+/*
+ * All the following are invalid uses of regexp quantifiers and
+ * should generate SyntaxErrors. That's what we're testing for.
+ *
+ * To allow the test to compile and run, we have to hide the errors
+ * inside eval strings, and check they are caught at run-time -
+ *
+ */
+status = inSection(1);
+testThis(' /a**/ ');
+
+status = inSection(2);
+testThis(' /a***/ ');
+
+status = inSection(3);
+testThis(' /a++/ ');
+
+status = inSection(4);
+testThis(' /a+++/ ');
+
+/*
+ * The ? quantifier, unlike * or +, may appear twice in succession.
+ * Thus we need at least three in a row to provoke a SyntaxError -
+ */
+
+status = inSection(5);
+testThis(' /a???/ ');
+
+status = inSection(6);
+testThis(' /a????/ ');
+
+
+/*
+ * Now do some weird things on the left side of the regexps -
+ */
+status = inSection(9);
+testThis(' /+a/ ');
+
+status = inSection(10);
+testThis(' /++a/ ');
+
+status = inSection(11);
+testThis(' /?a/ ');
+
+status = inSection(12);
+testThis(' /??a/ ');
+
+
+/*
+ * Misusing the {DecmalDigits} quantifier - according to BOTH ECMA and Perl.
+ *
+ * Just as with the * and + quantifiers above, can't have two {DecmalDigits}
+ * quantifiers in succession - it's a SyntaxError.
+ */
+status = inSection(28);
+testThis(' /x{1}{1}/ ');
+
+status = inSection(29);
+testThis(' /x{1,}{1}/ ');
+
+status = inSection(30);
+testThis(' /x{1,2}{1}/ ');
+
+status = inSection(31);
+testThis(' /x{1}{1,}/ ');
+
+status = inSection(32);
+testThis(' /x{1,}{1,}/ ');
+
+status = inSection(33);
+testThis(' /x{1,2}{1,}/ ');
+
+status = inSection(34);
+testThis(' /x{1}{1,2}/ ');
+
+status = inSection(35);
+testThis(' /x{1,}{1,2}/ ');
+
+status = inSection(36);
+testThis(' /x{1,2}{1,2}/ ');
+
+
+
+//-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
+test();
+//-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+
+/*
+ * Invalid syntax should generate a SyntaxError
+ */
+function testThis(sInvalidSyntax)
+{
+  expect = TEST_PASSED;
+  actual = TEST_FAILED_BADLY;
+
+  try
+  {
+    eval(sInvalidSyntax);
+  }
+  catch(e)
+  {
+    if (e instanceof SyntaxError)
+      actual = TEST_PASSED;
+    else
+      actual = TEST_FAILED;
+  }
+
+  statusitems[UBound] = status;
+  expectedvalues[UBound] = expect;
+  actualvalues[UBound] = actual;
+  UBound++;
+}
+
+
+/*
+ * Allowed syntax shouldn't generate any errors
+ */
+function checkThis(sAllowedSyntax)
+{
+  expect = CHECK_PASSED;
+  actual = CHECK_PASSED;
+
+  try
+  {
+    eval(sAllowedSyntax);
+  }
+  catch(e)
+  {
+    actual = CHECK_FAILED;
+  }
+
+  statusitems[UBound] = status;
+  expectedvalues[UBound] = expect;
+  actualvalues[UBound] = actual;
+  UBound++;
+}
+
+
+function test()
+{
+  printBugNumber(BUGNUMBER);
+  printStatus(summary);
+
+  for (var i=0; i<UBound; i++)
+  {
+    reportCompare(expectedvalues[i], actualvalues[i], statusitems[i]);
+  }
+}