Adding upstream version 115.7.0esr.upstream/115.7.0esrupstream

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>

1 files changed, 156 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/js/src/tests/non262/misc/builtin-methods-reject-null-undefined-this.js b/js/src/tests/non262/misc/builtin-methods-reject-null-undefined-this.js
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..c6f0a8f39a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/js/src/tests/non262/misc/builtin-methods-reject-null-undefined-this.js
@@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
+/*
+ * Any copyright is dedicated to the Public Domain.
+ * http://creativecommons.org/licenses/publicdomain/
+ */
+
+//-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
+var BUGNUMBER = 619283;
+var summary =
+  "ECMAScript built-in methods that immediately throw when |this| is " +
+  "|undefined| or |null| (due to CheckObjectCoercible, ToObject, or ToString)";
+
+print(BUGNUMBER + ": " + summary);
+
+/**************
+ * BEGIN TEST *
+ **************/
+
+// We can't just exhaustively loop over everything because 1) method properties
+// might be extensions with special |this| handling, and 2) some methods don't
+// *quite* immediately throw a TypeError, first thing, if |this| is |undefined|
+// or |null|, or their algorithms are very slightly ambiguous about whether they
+// do.  Why?  Ipse-dixitism.  *shrug*
+
+var ClassToMethodMap =
+  {
+    Object:  [/* "toString" has special |this| handling */
+              "toLocaleString", "valueOf", "hasOwnProperty",
+              /*
+               * "isPrototypeOf" has special |this| handling already tested in
+               * non262/Object/isPrototypeOf.js.
+               */
+              /*
+               * "isPrototypeOf" has special |this| handling already tested in
+               * non262/Object/propertyIsEnumerable.js.
+               */
+              "__defineGetter__", "__defineSetter__",
+              "__lookupGetter__", "__lookupSetter__",
+              ],
+    // Function methods often don't ToObject(this) as their very first step,
+    // and they're already stepwise well-tested such that manual tests here
+    // would be redundant.
+    Array:   ["toString", "toLocaleString", "concat", "join", "pop", "push",
+              "reverse", "shift", "slice", "sort", "splice", "unshift",
+              "indexOf", "lastIndexOf", "every", "some", "forEach", "map",
+              "filter", "reduce", "reduceRight"],
+    String:  ["toString", "valueOf", "charAt", "charCodeAt", "concat",
+              "indexOf", "lastIndexOf", "localeCompare", "match", "replace",
+              "search", "slice", "split", "substring", "toLowerCase",
+              "toLocaleLowerCase", "toUpperCase", "toLocaleUpperCase", "trim",
+              "bold", "italics", "fixed", "fontsize",
+              "fontcolor", "link", "anchor", "strike", "small", "big", "blink",
+              "sup", "sub", "substr", "trimLeft", "trimRight",
+              ],
+    Boolean: ["toString", "valueOf"],
+    Number:  ["toString", "toLocaleString", "valueOf",
+              /*
+               * toFixed doesn't *immediately* test |this| for number or
+               * Number-ness, but because the ToInteger(void 0) which arguably
+               * precedes it in the toFixed algorithm won't throw in this test,
+               * we don't need to specially test it.
+               */
+              "toFixed",
+              "toExponential", "toPrecision"],
+    Date:    ["toDateString", "toTimeString", "toLocaleString",
+              "toLocaleDateString", "toLocaleTimeString", "valueOf", "getTime",
+              "getFullYear", "getUTCFullYear", "getMonth", "getUTCMonth",
+              "getDate", "getUTCDate", "getDay", "getUTCDay", "getHours",
+              "getUTCHours", "getMinutes", "getUTCMinutes", "getSeconds",
+              "getUTCSeconds", "getMilliseconds", "getUTCMilliseconds",
+              /*
+               * toFixed doesn't *immediately* test |this| for number or
+               * Number-ness, but because the TimeClip(ToNumber(void 0)) which
+               * arguably precedes it in the setTime algorithm won't throw in
+               * this test, we don't need to specially test it.
+               */
+              "setTime",
+              "getTimezoneOffset", "setMilliseconds", "setUTCMilliseconds",
+              "setSeconds", "setUTCSeconds", "setMinutes", "setUTCMinutes",
+              "setHours", "setUTCHours", "setDate", "setUTCDate",  "setMonth",
+              "setUTCMonth", "setFullYear", "setUTCFullYear", "toUTCString",
+              "toISOString", "toJSON",
+              "getYear", "setYear",  "toGMTString"],
+    RegExp:  ["exec", "test", "toString"],
+    Error:   ["toString"],
+  };
+
+var badThisValues = [null, undefined];
+
+function testMethod(Class, className, method)
+{
+  var expr;
+
+  // Try out explicit this values
+  for (var i = 0, sz = badThisValues.length; i < sz; i++)
+  {
+    var badThis = badThisValues[i];
+
+    expr = className + ".prototype." + method + ".call(" + badThis + ")";
+    try
+    {
+      Class.prototype[method].call(badThis);
+      throw new Error(expr + " didn't throw a TypeError");
+    }
+    catch (e)
+    {
+      assertEq(e instanceof TypeError, true,
+               "wrong error for " + expr + ", instead threw " + e);
+    }
+
+    expr = className + ".prototype." + method + ".apply(" + badThis + ")";
+    try
+    {
+      Class.prototype[method].apply(badThis);
+      throw new Error(expr + " didn't throw a TypeError");
+    }
+    catch (e)
+    {
+      assertEq(e instanceof TypeError, true,
+               "wrong error for " + expr + ", instead threw " + e);
+    }
+  }
+
+  // ..and for good measure..
+
+  expr = "(0, " + className + ".prototype." + method + ")()"
+  try
+  {
+    // comma operator to call GetValue() on the method and de-Reference it
+    (0, Class.prototype[method])();
+    throw new Error(expr + " didn't throw a TypeError");
+  }
+  catch (e)
+  {
+    assertEq(e instanceof TypeError, true,
+             "wrong error for " + expr + ", instead threw " + e);
+  }
+}
+
+for (var className in ClassToMethodMap)
+{
+  var Class = this[className];
+
+  var methodNames = ClassToMethodMap[className];
+  for (var i = 0, sz = methodNames.length; i < sz; i++)
+  {
+    var method = methodNames[i];
+    testMethod(Class, className, method);
+  }
+}
+
+/******************************************************************************/
+
+if (typeof reportCompare === "function")
+  reportCompare(true, true);
+
+print("All tests passed!");