diff options
| author | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-07 09:22:09 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-07 09:22:09 +0000 |
| commit | 43a97878ce14b72f0981164f87f2e35e14151312 (patch) | |
| tree | 620249daf56c0258faa40cbdcf9cfba06de2a846 /testing/web-platform/tests/content-security-policy/child-src/child-src-conflicting-frame-src.sub.html | |
| parent | Initial commit. (diff) | |
| download | firefox-43a97878ce14b72f0981164f87f2e35e14151312.tar.xz firefox-43a97878ce14b72f0981164f87f2e35e14151312.zip | |
Adding upstream version 110.0.1.upstream/110.0.1upstream
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'testing/web-platform/tests/content-security-policy/child-src/child-src-conflicting-frame-src.sub.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | testing/web-platform/tests/content-security-policy/child-src/child-src-conflicting-frame-src.sub.html | 65 |
1 files changed, 65 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/testing/web-platform/tests/content-security-policy/child-src/child-src-conflicting-frame-src.sub.html b/testing/web-platform/tests/content-security-policy/child-src/child-src-conflicting-frame-src.sub.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..7f6f9294fa --- /dev/null +++ b/testing/web-platform/tests/content-security-policy/child-src/child-src-conflicting-frame-src.sub.html @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@ +<!DOCTYPE html> +<html> +<head> + <title>child-src-blocked</title> + <meta http-equiv="Content-Security-Policy" content="frame-src 'none'; child-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; connect-src 'self';"> + <script src="/resources/testharness.js"></script> + <script src="/resources/testharnessreport.js"></script> + <script src='../support/logTest.sub.js?logs=["PASS IFrame %231 generated a load event.", "violated-directive=frame-src"]'></script> + <script> + window.addEventListener("message", function(event) { + alert_assert(event.data); + }, false); + + window.addEventListener("securitypolicyviolation", function(e) { + log("violated-directive=" + e.violatedDirective); + }); + + function alert_assert(msg) { + t_log.step(function() { + if (msg.match(/^FAIL/i)) { + assert_unreached(msg); + t_log.done(); + } + for (var i = 0; i < expected_alerts.length; i++) { + if (expected_alerts[i] == msg) { + assert_equals(expected_alerts[i], msg); + expected_alerts.splice(i, 1); + if (expected_alerts.length == 0) { + t_log.done(); + } + return; + } + } + assert_unreached('unexpected alert: ' + msg); + t_log.done(); + }); + } + + </script> + <!-- enforcing policy: +frame-src 'none'; child-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; connect-src 'self'; +--> + <p> + A more permissive child-src should not relax restrictions from a less- + permissive frame-src. Directives still combine for least privilege, even when + one obsoletes another. + </p> + <script> + window.wasPostTestScriptParsed = true; + var loads = 0; + + function loadEvent() { + loads++; + log("PASS " + "IFrame #" + loads + " generated a load event."); + } + + </script> +</head> + +<body> + <iframe src="/content-security-policy/support/postmessage-fail.html" onload="loadEvent()" onerror="log('FAIL')"></iframe> + <div id="log"></div> +</body> + +</html> |