diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-tables/percent-width-ignored-002.tentative.html')
-rw-r--r-- | testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-tables/percent-width-ignored-002.tentative.html | 18 |
1 files changed, 18 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-tables/percent-width-ignored-002.tentative.html b/testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-tables/percent-width-ignored-002.tentative.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..e18913f0b8 --- /dev/null +++ b/testing/web-platform/tests/css/css-tables/percent-width-ignored-002.tentative.html @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +<!DOCTYPE html> +<script src='/resources/testharness.js'></script> +<script src='/resources/testharnessreport.js'></script> +<script src='/resources/check-layout-th.js'></script> +<link rel="author" title="David Grogan" href="dgrogan@chromium.org"> +<link rel="help" href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3336"> +<meta name="assert" content="Should cell's percent width be ignored when its table is nested in a shrink to fit block?" /> +<p>Edge 44.17763 and Chrome 70 make this 300px wide. FF makes it 150px wide.</p> +<div id="stf" style="position:absolute; background:blue;" data-expected-width=300> + <table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> + <td style="width:50%;"> + <div style="width:150px; height:150px;"></div> + </td> + </table> +</div> +<script> +checkLayout('#stf'); +</script> |