Adding upstream version 4:7.4.7.upstream/4%7.4.7upstream

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>

1 files changed, 143 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/compilerplugins/clang/test/unnecessaryparen.cxx b/compilerplugins/clang/test/unnecessaryparen.cxx
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..ccc2b4ce6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/compilerplugins/clang/test/unnecessaryparen.cxx
@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
+/* -*- Mode: C++; tab-width: 4; indent-tabs-mode: nil; c-basic-offset: 4; fill-column: 100 -*- */
+/*
+ * This file is part of the LibreOffice project.
+ *
+ * This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public
+ * License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this
+ * file, You can obtain one at http://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/.
+ */
+
+#include <memory>
+#include <string>
+#include <rtl/ustring.hxx>
+#include <o3tl/typed_flags_set.hxx>
+
+#define MACRO (1)
+
+bool foo(int);
+
+enum class EFoo { Bar };
+
+struct S { operator bool(); };
+
+enum class BrowseMode
+{
+    Modules = 0x01,
+    Top = 0x02,
+    Bottom = 0x04,
+    Left = 0x08,
+};
+namespace o3tl
+{
+template <> struct typed_flags<BrowseMode> : is_typed_flags<BrowseMode, 0xf>
+{
+};
+}
+
+int main()
+{
+    int x = 1;
+    x = ((2)); // expected-error {{parentheses around parentheses [loplugin:unnecessaryparen]}}
+
+    if ((foo(1))) foo(2); // expected-error {{parentheses immediately inside if statement [loplugin:unnecessaryparen]}}
+
+    foo((1)); // expected-error {{parentheses immediately inside single-arg call [loplugin:unnecessaryparen]}}
+
+    int y = (x); // expected-error {{parentheses immediately inside vardecl statement [loplugin:unnecessaryparen]}}
+    (void)y;
+
+    EFoo efoo = EFoo::Bar;
+    switch (efoo) {
+        case (EFoo::Bar): break; // expected-error {{parentheses immediately inside case statement [loplugin:unnecessaryparen]}}
+    }
+
+    int z = (y) ? 1 : 0; // expected-error {{unnecessary parentheses around identifier [loplugin:unnecessaryparen]}}
+    (void)z;
+
+    int v1 = (static_cast<short>(1)) + 1; // expected-error {{unnecessary parentheses around cast [loplugin:unnecessaryparen]}}
+    (void)v1;
+
+    // No warnings, used to silence -Wunreachable-code:
+    if ((false)) {
+        return 0;
+    }
+    x = (true) ? 0 : 1;
+
+    // More "no warnings", at least potentially used to silence -Wunreachable-code:
+    while ((false)) {
+        return 0;
+    }
+    for (; (false);) {
+        return 0;
+    }
+    x = foo(0) && (false) ? 0 : 1;
+    x = MACRO < (0) ? 0 : 1;
+        // cf. odd Clang -Wunreachable-code--suppression mechanism when the macro itself contains
+        // parentheses, causing the issue that lead to c421ac3f9432f2e9468d28447dc4c2e45b6f4da3
+        // "Revert loplugin:unnecessaryparen warning around integer literals"
+
+    int v2 = (1); // expected-error {{parentheses immediately inside vardecl statement [loplugin:unnecessaryparen]}}
+    (void)v2;
+
+    std::string v3;
+    v3 = (std::string("xx") + "xx"); // expected-error {{parentheses immediately inside assignment [loplugin:unnecessaryparen]}}
+    (void)v3;
+
+    S s1;
+    if ((s1)) { // expected-error {{parentheses immediately inside if statement [loplugin:unnecessaryparen]}}
+        return 0;
+    }
+    S s2;
+    if ((s2 = s1)) {
+        return 0;
+    }
+
+    (void) sizeof (int);
+    (void) sizeof (x); // expect no warning (for whatever reason; for symmetry with above case?)
+
+    // Expecting just one error, not reported twice during TraverseInitListExpr:
+    int a[] = {(x)}; // expected-error {{unnecessary parentheses around identifier [loplugin:unnecessaryparen]}}
+    (void) a;
+
+    (void) (+1); // expected-error {{unnecessary parentheses around signed numeric literal [loplugin:unnecessaryparen]}}
+    (void) (-1); // expected-error {{unnecessary parentheses around signed numeric literal [loplugin:unnecessaryparen]}}
+
+    // For simplicity's sake, even warn about pathological cases that would require adding
+    // whitespace when removing the parentheses (as is also necessary in other cases anyway, like
+    // "throw(x);"); it is unlikely that there are any actual occurrences of code like "-(-1)" that
+    // would benefit from the parentheses readability-wise, compared to "- -1":
+    (void) -(-1); // expected-error {{unnecessary parentheses around signed numeric literal [loplugin:unnecessaryparen]}}
+
+    char *p = nullptr;
+    delete (p); // expected-error {{parentheses immediately inside delete expr [loplugin:unnecessaryparen]}}
+
+    BrowseMode nBits = ( BrowseMode::Modules | BrowseMode::Top ); // expected-error {{parentheses immediately inside vardecl statement [loplugin:unnecessaryparen]}}
+    (void)nBits;
+
+    OUString::number((v2+1)); // expected-error {{parentheses immediately inside single-arg call [loplugin:unnecessaryparen]}}
+};
+
+struct B { operator bool() const; };
+
+struct N { bool operator !(); };
+
+class Foo2
+{
+    int* p;
+    B b;
+    N n;
+
+    int foo2()
+    {
+        return (p) ? 1 : 0; // expected-error {{unnecessary parentheses around member expr [loplugin:unnecessaryparen]}}
+    }
+
+    static int foo3(Foo2 & foo) {
+        (void) !(foo.p);
+        (void) !(foo.b);
+        (void) !(foo.n);
+        return (foo.p) ? 1 : 0;
+    }
+};
+
+/* vim:set shiftwidth=4 softtabstop=4 expandtab cinoptions=b1,g0,N-s cinkeys+=0=break: */