Adding upstream version 6.1.76.upstream/6.1.76upstream

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>

1 files changed, 135 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/hugetlb.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/hugetlb.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..0fa724d82
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/hugetlb.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
+==================
+HugeTLB Controller
+==================
+
+HugeTLB controller can be created by first mounting the cgroup filesystem.
+
+# mount -t cgroup -o hugetlb none /sys/fs/cgroup
+
+With the above step, the initial or the parent HugeTLB group becomes
+visible at /sys/fs/cgroup. At bootup, this group includes all the tasks in
+the system. /sys/fs/cgroup/tasks lists the tasks in this cgroup.
+
+New groups can be created under the parent group /sys/fs/cgroup::
+
+  # cd /sys/fs/cgroup
+  # mkdir g1
+  # echo $$ > g1/tasks
+
+The above steps create a new group g1 and move the current shell
+process (bash) into it.
+
+Brief summary of control files::
+
+ hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.rsvd.limit_in_bytes            # set/show limit of "hugepagesize" hugetlb reservations
+ hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.rsvd.max_usage_in_bytes        # show max "hugepagesize" hugetlb reservations and no-reserve faults
+ hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.rsvd.usage_in_bytes            # show current reservations and no-reserve faults for "hugepagesize" hugetlb
+ hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.rsvd.failcnt                   # show the number of allocation failure due to HugeTLB reservation limit
+ hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.limit_in_bytes                 # set/show limit of "hugepagesize" hugetlb faults
+ hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.max_usage_in_bytes             # show max "hugepagesize" hugetlb  usage recorded
+ hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.usage_in_bytes                 # show current usage for "hugepagesize" hugetlb
+ hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.failcnt                        # show the number of allocation failure due to HugeTLB usage limit
+ hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.numa_stat                      # show the numa information of the hugetlb memory charged to this cgroup
+
+For a system supporting three hugepage sizes (64k, 32M and 1G), the control
+files include::
+
+  hugetlb.1GB.limit_in_bytes
+  hugetlb.1GB.max_usage_in_bytes
+  hugetlb.1GB.numa_stat
+  hugetlb.1GB.usage_in_bytes
+  hugetlb.1GB.failcnt
+  hugetlb.1GB.rsvd.limit_in_bytes
+  hugetlb.1GB.rsvd.max_usage_in_bytes
+  hugetlb.1GB.rsvd.usage_in_bytes
+  hugetlb.1GB.rsvd.failcnt
+  hugetlb.64KB.limit_in_bytes
+  hugetlb.64KB.max_usage_in_bytes
+  hugetlb.64KB.numa_stat
+  hugetlb.64KB.usage_in_bytes
+  hugetlb.64KB.failcnt
+  hugetlb.64KB.rsvd.limit_in_bytes
+  hugetlb.64KB.rsvd.max_usage_in_bytes
+  hugetlb.64KB.rsvd.usage_in_bytes
+  hugetlb.64KB.rsvd.failcnt
+  hugetlb.32MB.limit_in_bytes
+  hugetlb.32MB.max_usage_in_bytes
+  hugetlb.32MB.numa_stat
+  hugetlb.32MB.usage_in_bytes
+  hugetlb.32MB.failcnt
+  hugetlb.32MB.rsvd.limit_in_bytes
+  hugetlb.32MB.rsvd.max_usage_in_bytes
+  hugetlb.32MB.rsvd.usage_in_bytes
+  hugetlb.32MB.rsvd.failcnt
+
+
+1. Page fault accounting
+
+hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.limit_in_bytes
+hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.max_usage_in_bytes
+hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.usage_in_bytes
+hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.failcnt
+
+The HugeTLB controller allows users to limit the HugeTLB usage (page fault) per
+control group and enforces the limit during page fault. Since HugeTLB
+doesn't support page reclaim, enforcing the limit at page fault time implies
+that, the application will get SIGBUS signal if it tries to fault in HugeTLB
+pages beyond its limit. Therefore the application needs to know exactly how many
+HugeTLB pages it uses before hand, and the sysadmin needs to make sure that
+there are enough available on the machine for all the users to avoid processes
+getting SIGBUS.
+
+
+2. Reservation accounting
+
+hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.rsvd.limit_in_bytes
+hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.rsvd.max_usage_in_bytes
+hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.rsvd.usage_in_bytes
+hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.rsvd.failcnt
+
+The HugeTLB controller allows to limit the HugeTLB reservations per control
+group and enforces the controller limit at reservation time and at the fault of
+HugeTLB memory for which no reservation exists. Since reservation limits are
+enforced at reservation time (on mmap or shget), reservation limits never causes
+the application to get SIGBUS signal if the memory was reserved before hand. For
+MAP_NORESERVE allocations, the reservation limit behaves the same as the fault
+limit, enforcing memory usage at fault time and causing the application to
+receive a SIGBUS if it's crossing its limit.
+
+Reservation limits are superior to page fault limits described above, since
+reservation limits are enforced at reservation time (on mmap or shget), and
+never causes the application to get SIGBUS signal if the memory was reserved
+before hand. This allows for easier fallback to alternatives such as
+non-HugeTLB memory for example. In the case of page fault accounting, it's very
+hard to avoid processes getting SIGBUS since the sysadmin needs precisely know
+the HugeTLB usage of all the tasks in the system and make sure there is enough
+pages to satisfy all requests. Avoiding tasks getting SIGBUS on overcommited
+systems is practically impossible with page fault accounting.
+
+
+3. Caveats with shared memory
+
+For shared HugeTLB memory, both HugeTLB reservation and page faults are charged
+to the first task that causes the memory to be reserved or faulted, and all
+subsequent uses of this reserved or faulted memory is done without charging.
+
+Shared HugeTLB memory is only uncharged when it is unreserved or deallocated.
+This is usually when the HugeTLB file is deleted, and not when the task that
+caused the reservation or fault has exited.
+
+
+4. Caveats with HugeTLB cgroup offline.
+
+When a HugeTLB cgroup goes offline with some reservations or faults still
+charged to it, the behavior is as follows:
+
+- The fault charges are charged to the parent HugeTLB cgroup (reparented),
+- the reservation charges remain on the offline HugeTLB cgroup.
+
+This means that if a HugeTLB cgroup gets offlined while there is still HugeTLB
+reservations charged to it, that cgroup persists as a zombie until all HugeTLB
+reservations are uncharged. HugeTLB reservations behave in this manner to match
+the memory controller whose cgroups also persist as zombie until all charged
+memory is uncharged. Also, the tracking of HugeTLB reservations is a bit more
+complex compared to the tracking of HugeTLB faults, so it is significantly
+harder to reparent reservations at offline time.