Adding upstream version 6.1.76.upstream/6.1.76upstream

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>

1 files changed, 240 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/Documentation/crypto/devel-algos.rst b/Documentation/crypto/devel-algos.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..f225a953a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/crypto/devel-algos.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,240 @@
+Developing Cipher Algorithms
+============================
+
+Registering And Unregistering Transformation
+--------------------------------------------
+
+There are three distinct types of registration functions in the Crypto
+API. One is used to register a generic cryptographic transformation,
+while the other two are specific to HASH transformations and
+COMPRESSion. We will discuss the latter two in a separate chapter, here
+we will only look at the generic ones.
+
+Before discussing the register functions, the data structure to be
+filled with each, struct crypto_alg, must be considered -- see below
+for a description of this data structure.
+
+The generic registration functions can be found in
+include/linux/crypto.h and their definition can be seen below. The
+former function registers a single transformation, while the latter
+works on an array of transformation descriptions. The latter is useful
+when registering transformations in bulk, for example when a driver
+implements multiple transformations.
+
+::
+
+       int crypto_register_alg(struct crypto_alg *alg);
+       int crypto_register_algs(struct crypto_alg *algs, int count);
+
+
+The counterparts to those functions are listed below.
+
+::
+
+       void crypto_unregister_alg(struct crypto_alg *alg);
+       void crypto_unregister_algs(struct crypto_alg *algs, int count);
+
+
+The registration functions return 0 on success, or a negative errno
+value on failure.  crypto_register_algs() succeeds only if it
+successfully registered all the given algorithms; if it fails partway
+through, then any changes are rolled back.
+
+The unregistration functions always succeed, so they don't have a
+return value.  Don't try to unregister algorithms that aren't
+currently registered.
+
+Single-Block Symmetric Ciphers [CIPHER]
+---------------------------------------
+
+Example of transformations: aes, serpent, ...
+
+This section describes the simplest of all transformation
+implementations, that being the CIPHER type used for symmetric ciphers.
+The CIPHER type is used for transformations which operate on exactly one
+block at a time and there are no dependencies between blocks at all.
+
+Registration specifics
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+The registration of [CIPHER] algorithm is specific in that struct
+crypto_alg field .cra_type is empty. The .cra_u.cipher has to be
+filled in with proper callbacks to implement this transformation.
+
+See struct cipher_alg below.
+
+Cipher Definition With struct cipher_alg
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+Struct cipher_alg defines a single block cipher.
+
+Here are schematics of how these functions are called when operated from
+other part of the kernel. Note that the .cia_setkey() call might happen
+before or after any of these schematics happen, but must not happen
+during any of these are in-flight.
+
+::
+
+             KEY ---.    PLAINTEXT ---.
+                    v                 v
+              .cia_setkey() -> .cia_encrypt()
+                                      |
+                                      '-----> CIPHERTEXT
+
+
+Please note that a pattern where .cia_setkey() is called multiple times
+is also valid:
+
+::
+
+
+      KEY1 --.    PLAINTEXT1 --.         KEY2 --.    PLAINTEXT2 --.
+             v                 v                v                 v
+       .cia_setkey() -> .cia_encrypt() -> .cia_setkey() -> .cia_encrypt()
+                               |                                  |
+                               '---> CIPHERTEXT1                  '---> CIPHERTEXT2
+
+
+Multi-Block Ciphers
+-------------------
+
+Example of transformations: cbc(aes), chacha20, ...
+
+This section describes the multi-block cipher transformation
+implementations. The multi-block ciphers are used for transformations
+which operate on scatterlists of data supplied to the transformation
+functions. They output the result into a scatterlist of data as well.
+
+Registration Specifics
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+The registration of multi-block cipher algorithms is one of the most
+standard procedures throughout the crypto API.
+
+Note, if a cipher implementation requires a proper alignment of data,
+the caller should use the functions of crypto_skcipher_alignmask() to
+identify a memory alignment mask. The kernel crypto API is able to
+process requests that are unaligned. This implies, however, additional
+overhead as the kernel crypto API needs to perform the realignment of
+the data which may imply moving of data.
+
+Cipher Definition With struct skcipher_alg
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+Struct skcipher_alg defines a multi-block cipher, or more generally, a
+length-preserving symmetric cipher algorithm.
+
+Scatterlist handling
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+Some drivers will want to use the Generic ScatterWalk in case the
+hardware needs to be fed separate chunks of the scatterlist which
+contains the plaintext and will contain the ciphertext. Please refer
+to the ScatterWalk interface offered by the Linux kernel scatter /
+gather list implementation.
+
+Hashing [HASH]
+--------------
+
+Example of transformations: crc32, md5, sha1, sha256,...
+
+Registering And Unregistering The Transformation
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+There are multiple ways to register a HASH transformation, depending on
+whether the transformation is synchronous [SHASH] or asynchronous
+[AHASH] and the amount of HASH transformations we are registering. You
+can find the prototypes defined in include/crypto/internal/hash.h:
+
+::
+
+       int crypto_register_ahash(struct ahash_alg *alg);
+
+       int crypto_register_shash(struct shash_alg *alg);
+       int crypto_register_shashes(struct shash_alg *algs, int count);
+
+
+The respective counterparts for unregistering the HASH transformation
+are as follows:
+
+::
+
+       void crypto_unregister_ahash(struct ahash_alg *alg);
+
+       void crypto_unregister_shash(struct shash_alg *alg);
+       void crypto_unregister_shashes(struct shash_alg *algs, int count);
+
+
+Cipher Definition With struct shash_alg and ahash_alg
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+Here are schematics of how these functions are called when operated from
+other part of the kernel. Note that the .setkey() call might happen
+before or after any of these schematics happen, but must not happen
+during any of these are in-flight. Please note that calling .init()
+followed immediately by .finish() is also a perfectly valid
+transformation.
+
+::
+
+       I)   DATA -----------.
+                            v
+             .init() -> .update() -> .final()      ! .update() might not be called
+                         ^    |         |            at all in this scenario.
+                         '----'         '---> HASH
+
+       II)  DATA -----------.-----------.
+                            v           v
+             .init() -> .update() -> .finup()      ! .update() may not be called
+                         ^    |         |            at all in this scenario.
+                         '----'         '---> HASH
+
+       III) DATA -----------.
+                            v
+                        .digest()                  ! The entire process is handled
+                            |                        by the .digest() call.
+                            '---------------> HASH
+
+
+Here is a schematic of how the .export()/.import() functions are called
+when used from another part of the kernel.
+
+::
+
+       KEY--.                 DATA--.
+            v                       v                  ! .update() may not be called
+        .setkey() -> .init() -> .update() -> .export()   at all in this scenario.
+                                 ^     |         |
+                                 '-----'         '--> PARTIAL_HASH
+
+       ----------- other transformations happen here -----------
+
+       PARTIAL_HASH--.   DATA1--.
+                     v          v
+                 .import -> .update() -> .final()     ! .update() may not be called
+                             ^    |         |           at all in this scenario.
+                             '----'         '--> HASH1
+
+       PARTIAL_HASH--.   DATA2-.
+                     v         v
+                 .import -> .finup()
+                               |
+                               '---------------> HASH2
+
+Note that it is perfectly legal to "abandon" a request object:
+- call .init() and then (as many times) .update()
+- _not_ call any of .final(), .finup() or .export() at any point in future
+
+In other words implementations should mind the resource allocation and clean-up.
+No resources related to request objects should remain allocated after a call
+to .init() or .update(), since there might be no chance to free them.
+
+
+Specifics Of Asynchronous HASH Transformation
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+Some of the drivers will want to use the Generic ScatterWalk in case the
+implementation needs to be fed separate chunks of the scatterlist which
+contains the input data. The buffer containing the resulting hash will
+always be properly aligned to .cra_alignmask so there is no need to
+worry about this.