Adding upstream version 6.1.76.upstream/6.1.76upstream

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>

1 files changed, 284 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/locking.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/locking.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..845a56162
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/locking.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,284 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+=================
+KVM Lock Overview
+=================
+
+1. Acquisition Orders
+---------------------
+
+The acquisition orders for mutexes are as follows:
+
+- kvm->lock is taken outside vcpu->mutex
+
+- kvm->lock is taken outside kvm->slots_lock and kvm->irq_lock
+
+- kvm->slots_lock is taken outside kvm->irq_lock, though acquiring
+  them together is quite rare.
+
+- Unlike kvm->slots_lock, kvm->slots_arch_lock is released before
+  synchronize_srcu(&kvm->srcu).  Therefore kvm->slots_arch_lock
+  can be taken inside a kvm->srcu read-side critical section,
+  while kvm->slots_lock cannot.
+
+- kvm->mn_active_invalidate_count ensures that pairs of
+  invalidate_range_start() and invalidate_range_end() callbacks
+  use the same memslots array.  kvm->slots_lock and kvm->slots_arch_lock
+  are taken on the waiting side in install_new_memslots, so MMU notifiers
+  must not take either kvm->slots_lock or kvm->slots_arch_lock.
+
+On x86:
+
+- vcpu->mutex is taken outside kvm->arch.hyperv.hv_lock
+
+- kvm->arch.mmu_lock is an rwlock.  kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages_lock and
+  kvm->arch.mmu_unsync_pages_lock are taken inside kvm->arch.mmu_lock, and
+  cannot be taken without already holding kvm->arch.mmu_lock (typically with
+  ``read_lock`` for the TDP MMU, thus the need for additional spinlocks).
+
+Everything else is a leaf: no other lock is taken inside the critical
+sections.
+
+2. Exception
+------------
+
+Fast page fault:
+
+Fast page fault is the fast path which fixes the guest page fault out of
+the mmu-lock on x86. Currently, the page fault can be fast in one of the
+following two cases:
+
+1. Access Tracking: The SPTE is not present, but it is marked for access
+   tracking. That means we need to restore the saved R/X bits. This is
+   described in more detail later below.
+
+2. Write-Protection: The SPTE is present and the fault is caused by
+   write-protect. That means we just need to change the W bit of the spte.
+
+What we use to avoid all the race is the Host-writable bit and MMU-writable bit
+on the spte:
+
+- Host-writable means the gfn is writable in the host kernel page tables and in
+  its KVM memslot.
+- MMU-writable means the gfn is writable in the guest's mmu and it is not
+  write-protected by shadow page write-protection.
+
+On fast page fault path, we will use cmpxchg to atomically set the spte W
+bit if spte.HOST_WRITEABLE = 1 and spte.WRITE_PROTECT = 1, to restore the saved
+R/X bits if for an access-traced spte, or both. This is safe because whenever
+changing these bits can be detected by cmpxchg.
+
+But we need carefully check these cases:
+
+1) The mapping from gfn to pfn
+
+The mapping from gfn to pfn may be changed since we can only ensure the pfn
+is not changed during cmpxchg. This is a ABA problem, for example, below case
+will happen:
+
++------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+| At the beginning::                                                     |
+|                                                                        |
+|	gpte = gfn1                                                      |
+|	gfn1 is mapped to pfn1 on host                                   |
+|	spte is the shadow page table entry corresponding with gpte and  |
+|	spte = pfn1                                                      |
++------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+| On fast page fault path:                                               |
++------------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
+| CPU 0:                             | CPU 1:                            |
++------------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
+| ::                                 |                                   |
+|                                    |                                   |
+|   old_spte = *spte;                |                                   |
++------------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
+|                                    | pfn1 is swapped out::             |
+|                                    |                                   |
+|                                    |    spte = 0;                      |
+|                                    |                                   |
+|                                    | pfn1 is re-alloced for gfn2.      |
+|                                    |                                   |
+|                                    | gpte is changed to point to       |
+|                                    | gfn2 by the guest::               |
+|                                    |                                   |
+|                                    |    spte = pfn1;                   |
++------------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
+| ::                                                                     |
+|                                                                        |
+|   if (cmpxchg(spte, old_spte, old_spte+W)                              |
+|	mark_page_dirty(vcpu->kvm, gfn1)                                 |
+|            OOPS!!!                                                     |
++------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+
+We dirty-log for gfn1, that means gfn2 is lost in dirty-bitmap.
+
+For direct sp, we can easily avoid it since the spte of direct sp is fixed
+to gfn.  For indirect sp, we disabled fast page fault for simplicity.
+
+A solution for indirect sp could be to pin the gfn, for example via
+kvm_vcpu_gfn_to_pfn_atomic, before the cmpxchg.  After the pinning:
+
+- We have held the refcount of pfn that means the pfn can not be freed and
+  be reused for another gfn.
+- The pfn is writable and therefore it cannot be shared between different gfns
+  by KSM.
+
+Then, we can ensure the dirty bitmaps is correctly set for a gfn.
+
+2) Dirty bit tracking
+
+In the origin code, the spte can be fast updated (non-atomically) if the
+spte is read-only and the Accessed bit has already been set since the
+Accessed bit and Dirty bit can not be lost.
+
+But it is not true after fast page fault since the spte can be marked
+writable between reading spte and updating spte. Like below case:
+
++------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+| At the beginning::                                                     |
+|                                                                        |
+|	spte.W = 0                                                       |
+|	spte.Accessed = 1                                                |
++------------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
+| CPU 0:                             | CPU 1:                            |
++------------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
+| In mmu_spte_clear_track_bits()::   |                                   |
+|                                    |                                   |
+|  old_spte = *spte;                 |                                   |
+|                                    |                                   |
+|                                    |                                   |
+|  /* 'if' condition is satisfied. */|                                   |
+|  if (old_spte.Accessed == 1 &&     |                                   |
+|       old_spte.W == 0)             |                                   |
+|     spte = 0ull;                   |                                   |
++------------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
+|                                    | on fast page fault path::         |
+|                                    |                                   |
+|                                    |    spte.W = 1                     |
+|                                    |                                   |
+|                                    | memory write on the spte::        |
+|                                    |                                   |
+|                                    |    spte.Dirty = 1                 |
++------------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
+|  ::                                |                                   |
+|                                    |                                   |
+|   else                             |                                   |
+|     old_spte = xchg(spte, 0ull)    |                                   |
+|   if (old_spte.Accessed == 1)      |                                   |
+|     kvm_set_pfn_accessed(spte.pfn);|                                   |
+|   if (old_spte.Dirty == 1)         |                                   |
+|     kvm_set_pfn_dirty(spte.pfn);   |                                   |
+|     OOPS!!!                        |                                   |
++------------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
+
+The Dirty bit is lost in this case.
+
+In order to avoid this kind of issue, we always treat the spte as "volatile"
+if it can be updated out of mmu-lock, see spte_has_volatile_bits(), it means,
+the spte is always atomically updated in this case.
+
+3) flush tlbs due to spte updated
+
+If the spte is updated from writable to readonly, we should flush all TLBs,
+otherwise rmap_write_protect will find a read-only spte, even though the
+writable spte might be cached on a CPU's TLB.
+
+As mentioned before, the spte can be updated to writable out of mmu-lock on
+fast page fault path, in order to easily audit the path, we see if TLBs need
+be flushed caused by this reason in mmu_spte_update() since this is a common
+function to update spte (present -> present).
+
+Since the spte is "volatile" if it can be updated out of mmu-lock, we always
+atomically update the spte, the race caused by fast page fault can be avoided,
+See the comments in spte_has_volatile_bits() and mmu_spte_update().
+
+Lockless Access Tracking:
+
+This is used for Intel CPUs that are using EPT but do not support the EPT A/D
+bits. In this case, PTEs are tagged as A/D disabled (using ignored bits), and
+when the KVM MMU notifier is called to track accesses to a page (via
+kvm_mmu_notifier_clear_flush_young), it marks the PTE not-present in hardware
+by clearing the RWX bits in the PTE and storing the original R & X bits in more
+unused/ignored bits. When the VM tries to access the page later on, a fault is
+generated and the fast page fault mechanism described above is used to
+atomically restore the PTE to a Present state. The W bit is not saved when the
+PTE is marked for access tracking and during restoration to the Present state,
+the W bit is set depending on whether or not it was a write access. If it
+wasn't, then the W bit will remain clear until a write access happens, at which
+time it will be set using the Dirty tracking mechanism described above.
+
+3. Reference
+------------
+
+``kvm_lock``
+^^^^^^^^^^^^
+
+:Type:		mutex
+:Arch:		any
+:Protects:	- vm_list
+
+``kvm_count_lock``
+^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+
+:Type:		raw_spinlock_t
+:Arch:		any
+:Protects:	- hardware virtualization enable/disable
+:Comment:	'raw' because hardware enabling/disabling must be atomic /wrt
+		migration.
+
+``kvm->mn_invalidate_lock``
+^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+
+:Type:          spinlock_t
+:Arch:          any
+:Protects:      mn_active_invalidate_count, mn_memslots_update_rcuwait
+
+``kvm_arch::tsc_write_lock``
+^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+
+:Type:		raw_spinlock_t
+:Arch:		x86
+:Protects:	- kvm_arch::{last_tsc_write,last_tsc_nsec,last_tsc_offset}
+		- tsc offset in vmcb
+:Comment:	'raw' because updating the tsc offsets must not be preempted.
+
+``kvm->mmu_lock``
+^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+:Type:		spinlock_t or rwlock_t
+:Arch:		any
+:Protects:	-shadow page/shadow tlb entry
+:Comment:	it is a spinlock since it is used in mmu notifier.
+
+``kvm->srcu``
+^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+:Type:		srcu lock
+:Arch:		any
+:Protects:	- kvm->memslots
+		- kvm->buses
+:Comment:	The srcu read lock must be held while accessing memslots (e.g.
+		when using gfn_to_* functions) and while accessing in-kernel
+		MMIO/PIO address->device structure mapping (kvm->buses).
+		The srcu index can be stored in kvm_vcpu->srcu_idx per vcpu
+		if it is needed by multiple functions.
+
+``kvm->slots_arch_lock``
+^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+:Type:          mutex
+:Arch:          any (only needed on x86 though)
+:Protects:      any arch-specific fields of memslots that have to be modified
+                in a ``kvm->srcu`` read-side critical section.
+:Comment:       must be held before reading the pointer to the current memslots,
+                until after all changes to the memslots are complete
+
+``wakeup_vcpus_on_cpu_lock``
+^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+:Type:		spinlock_t
+:Arch:		x86
+:Protects:	wakeup_vcpus_on_cpu
+:Comment:	This is a per-CPU lock and it is used for VT-d posted-interrupts.
+		When VT-d posted-interrupts is supported and the VM has assigned
+		devices, we put the blocked vCPU on the list blocked_vcpu_on_cpu
+		protected by blocked_vcpu_on_cpu_lock, when VT-d hardware issues
+		wakeup notification event since external interrupts from the
+		assigned devices happens, we will find the vCPU on the list to
+		wakeup.