summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/browser/base/content/test/performance/browser_tabclose.js
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'browser/base/content/test/performance/browser_tabclose.js')
-rw-r--r--browser/base/content/test/performance/browser_tabclose.js108
1 files changed, 108 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/browser/base/content/test/performance/browser_tabclose.js b/browser/base/content/test/performance/browser_tabclose.js
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..961686587f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/browser/base/content/test/performance/browser_tabclose.js
@@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
+"use strict";
+
+/**
+ * WHOA THERE: We should never be adding new things to EXPECTED_REFLOWS.
+ * Instead of adding reflows to the list, you should be modifying your code to
+ * avoid the reflow.
+ *
+ * See https://firefox-source-docs.mozilla.org/performance/bestpractices.html
+ * for tips on how to do that.
+ */
+const EXPECTED_REFLOWS = [
+ /**
+ * Nothing here! Please don't add anything new!
+ */
+];
+
+/*
+ * This test ensures that there are no unexpected
+ * uninterruptible reflows when closing new tabs.
+ */
+add_task(async function () {
+ // Force-enable tab animations
+ gReduceMotionOverride = false;
+
+ await ensureNoPreloadedBrowser();
+ await disableFxaBadge();
+
+ // The test starts on about:blank and opens an about:blank
+ // tab which triggers opening the toolbar since
+ // ensureNoPreloadedBrowser sets AboutNewTab.newTabURL to about:blank.
+ await SpecialPowers.pushPrefEnv({
+ set: [["browser.toolbars.bookmarks.visibility", "never"]],
+ });
+
+ let tab = await BrowserTestUtils.openNewForegroundTab(gBrowser);
+ await TestUtils.waitForCondition(() => tab._fullyOpen);
+
+ let tabStripRect =
+ gBrowser.tabContainer.arrowScrollbox.getBoundingClientRect();
+ let newTabButtonRect =
+ gBrowser.tabContainer.newTabButton.getBoundingClientRect();
+ let inRange = (val, min, max) => min <= val && val <= max;
+
+ // Add a reflow observer and open a new tab.
+ await withPerfObserver(
+ async function () {
+ let switchDone = BrowserTestUtils.waitForEvent(window, "TabSwitchDone");
+ gBrowser.removeTab(tab, { animate: true });
+ await BrowserTestUtils.waitForEvent(tab, "TabAnimationEnd");
+ await switchDone;
+ },
+ {
+ expectedReflows: EXPECTED_REFLOWS,
+ frames: {
+ filter: rects =>
+ rects.filter(
+ r =>
+ !(
+ // We expect all changes to be within the tab strip.
+ (
+ r.y1 >= tabStripRect.top &&
+ r.y2 <= tabStripRect.bottom &&
+ r.x1 >= tabStripRect.left &&
+ r.x2 <= tabStripRect.right &&
+ // The closed tab should disappear at the same time as the previous
+ // tab gets selected, causing both tab areas to change color at once:
+ // this should be a single rect of the width of 2 tabs, and can
+ // include the '+' button if it starts its animation.
+ ((r.w > gBrowser.selectedTab.clientWidth &&
+ r.x2 <= newTabButtonRect.right) ||
+ // The '+' icon moves with an animation. At the end of the animation
+ // the former and new positions can touch each other causing the rect
+ // to have twice the icon's width.
+ (r.h == 13 && r.w <= 2 * 13 + kMaxEmptyPixels) ||
+ // We sometimes have a rect for the right most 2px of the '+' button.
+ (r.h == 2 && r.w == 2))
+ )
+ )
+ ),
+ exceptions: [
+ {
+ name:
+ "bug 1444886 - the next tab should be selected at the same time" +
+ " as the closed one disappears",
+ condition: r =>
+ // In tab strip
+ r.y1 >= tabStripRect.top &&
+ r.y2 <= tabStripRect.bottom &&
+ r.x1 >= tabStripRect.left &&
+ r.x2 <= tabStripRect.right &&
+ // Width of one tab plus tab separator(s)
+ inRange(gBrowser.selectedTab.clientWidth - r.w, 0, 2),
+ },
+ {
+ name: "bug 1446449 - spurious tab switch spinner",
+ condition: r =>
+ AppConstants.DEBUG &&
+ // In the content area
+ r.y1 >=
+ document.getElementById("appcontent").getBoundingClientRect()
+ .top,
+ },
+ ],
+ },
+ }
+ );
+ is(EXPECTED_REFLOWS.length, 0, "No reflows are expected when closing a tab");
+});