1 files changed, 131 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/comm/third_party/botan/doc/goals.rst b/comm/third_party/botan/doc/goals.rst
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..840e1bd818
--- /dev/null
+++ b/comm/third_party/botan/doc/goals.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
+
+Project Goals
+================================
+
+Botan seeks to be a broadly applicable library that can be used to implement a
+range of secure distributed systems.
+
+The library has the following project goals guiding changes. It does not succeed
+in all of these areas in every way just yet, but it describes the system that is
+the desired end result. Over time further progress is made in each.
+
+* Secure and reliable. The implementations must of course be correct and well
+  tested, and attacks such as side channels and fault attacks should be
+  accounted for where necessary. The library should never crash, or invoke
+  undefined behavior, regardless of circumstances.
+
+* Implement schemes important in practice. It should be practical to implement
+  any real-world crypto protocol using just what the library provides. It is
+  worth some (limited) additional complexity in the library, in order to expand
+  the set of applications which can easily adopt Botan.
+
+* Ease of use. It should be straightforward for an application programmer to do
+  whatever it is they need to do. There should be one obvious way to perform any
+  operation. The API should be predicable, and follow the "principle of least
+  astonishment" in its design. This is not just a nicety; confusing APIs often
+  result in errors that end up compromising security.
+
+* Simplicity of design, clarity of code, ease of review. The code should be easy
+  to read and understand by other library developers, users seeking to better
+  understand the behavior of the code, and by professional reviewers looking for
+  bugs. This is important because bugs in convoluted code can easily escape
+  multiple expert reviews, and end up living on for years.
+
+* Well tested. The code should be correct against the spec, with as close to
+  100% test coverage as possible. All available static and dynamic analysis
+  tools at our disposal should be used, including fuzzers, symbolic execution,
+  and protocol specific tools. Within reason, all warnings from compilers and
+  static analyzers should be addressed, even if they seem like false positives,
+  because that maximizes the signal value of new warnings from the tool.
+
+* Safe defaults. Policies should aim to be highly restrictive by default, and if
+  they must be made less restrictive by certain applications, it should be
+  obvious to the developer that they are doing something unsafe.
+
+* Post quantum security. Possibly a practical quantum computer that can break
+  RSA and ECC will never be built, but the future is notoriously hard to predict.
+  It seems prudent to begin designing and deploying systems now which have at
+  least the option of using a post-quantum scheme. Botan provides a conservative
+  selection of algorithms thought to be post-quantum secure.
+
+* Performance. Botan does not in every case strive to be faster than every other
+  software implementation, but performance should be competitive and over time
+  new optimizations are identified and applied.
+
+* Support whatever I/O mechanism the application wants. Allow the application to
+  control all aspects of how the network is contacted, and ensure the API makes
+  asynchronous operations easy to handle. This both insulates Botan from
+  system-specific details and allows the application to use whatever networking
+  style they please.
+
+* Portability to modern systems. Botan does not run everywhere, and we actually
+  do not want it to (see non-goals below). But we do want it to run on anything
+  that someone is deploying new applications on. That includes both major
+  platforms like Windows, Linux, Android and iOS, and also promising new systems
+  such as IncludeOS and Fuchsia.
+
+* Well documented. Ideally every public API would have some place in the manual
+  describing its usage.
+
+* Useful command line utility. The botan command line tool should be flexible
+  and featured enough to replace similar tools such as ``openssl`` for everyday
+  users.
+
+Non-Goals
+-------------------------
+
+There are goals some crypto libraries have, but which Botan actively does not
+seek to address.
+
+* Deep embedded support. Botan requires a heap, C++ exceptions, and RTTI, and at
+  least in terms of performance optimizations effectively assumes a 32 or 64 bit
+  processor. It is not suitable for deploying on, say FreeRTOS running on a
+  MSP430, or smartcard with an 8 bit CPU and 256 bytes RAM. A larger SoC, such
+  as a Cortex-A7 running Linux, is entirely within scope.
+
+* Implementing every crypto scheme in existence. The focus is on algorithms
+  which are in practical use in systems deployed now, as well as promising
+  algorithms for future deployment. Many algorithms which were of interest
+  in the past but never saw widespread deployment and have no compelling
+  benefit over other designs have been removed to simplify the codebase.
+
+* Portable to obsolete systems. There is no reason for crypto software to
+  support ancient OS platforms like SunOS or Windows 2000, since these unpatched
+  systems are completely unsafe anyway. The additional complexity supporting
+  such platforms just creates more room for bugs.
+
+* Portable to every C++ compiler ever made. Over time Botan moves forward to
+  both take advantage of new language/compiler features, and to shed workarounds
+  for dealing with bugs in ancient compilers, allowing further simplifications
+  in the codebase. The set of supported compilers is fixed for each new release
+  branch, for example Botan 2.x will always support GCC 4.8. But a future 3.x
+  release version will likely increase the required versions for all compilers.
+
+* FIPS 140 validation. The primary developer was (long ago) a consultant with a
+  NIST approved testing lab. He does not have a positive view of the process or
+  results, particularly when it comes to Level 1 software validations. The only
+  benefit of a Level 1 validation is to allow for government sales, and the cost
+  of validation includes enormous amounts of time and money, adding 'checks'
+  that are useless or actively harmful, then freezing the software so security
+  updates cannot be applied in the future. It does force a certain minimum
+  standard (ie, FIPS Level 1 does assure AES and RSA are probably implemented
+  correctly) but this is an issue of interop not security since Level 1 does not
+  seriously consider attacks of any kind. Any security budget would be far
+  better spent on a review from a specialized crypto consultancy, who would look
+  for actual flaws.
+
+  That said it would be easy to add a "FIPS 140" build mode to Botan, which just
+  disabled all the builtin crypto and wrapped whatever the most recent OpenSSL
+  FIPS module exports.
+
+* Educational purposes. The library code is intended to be easy to read and
+  review, and so might be useful in an educational context. However it does not
+  contain any toy ciphers (unless you count DES and RC4) nor any tools for
+  simple cryptanalysis. Generally the manual and source comments assume previous
+  knowledge on the basic concepts involved.
+
+* User proof. Some libraries provide a very high level API in an attempt to save
+  the user from themselves. Occasionally they succeed. It would be appropriate
+  and useful to build such an API on top of Botan, but Botan itself wants to
+  cover a broad set of uses cases and some of these involve having pointy things
+  within reach.